All posts

Original research

We audited 57 Yorkshire driving instructors. Half have no website.

Original research: who's online, who isn't, and what their websites actually look like. 5,533 reviews, 4.92★ average, and a much lower competitive bar than the industry tells you.

10 May 20267 min read

We audited 57 Yorkshire driving instructors in May 2026. Half (51%) have no website at all. Of the 49% who do, most are on Wix or WordPress templates dated 2016 to 2022. Their Google reviews are very good (4.92★ average across 5,533 reviews) but only 26% link any social account from their Google Business Profile. Show up with a clean, current website and you put yourself in the top 10% of your local market straight away. The bar is much lower than the industry tells you.

The rest of this post is the numbers, the methodology, and what to do about it if you're an instructor reading.

The headline numbers

MetricValue
Instructors audited57
Have a website28 (49%)
No website at all29 (51%)
Average GBP rating4.92★
Have a perfect 5★ rating36 (63%)
Average GBP reviews97 per business
Have 100+ reviews18 (32%)
Have 50+ reviews37 (65%)
Link a Facebook page from GBP15 (26%)
Link Instagram or X/Twitter3 each (5%)

51% of instructors have no website at all

More than half the instructors in our sample do not have a dedicated website. They show up only on their Google Business Profile, sometimes a Facebook page, and occasionally a listing on one of the bigger driving-school aggregators.

That's a striking number for a profession where 70% of new enquiries start with a Google search and where parents researching a stranger to put their teenager in a car with want more than three lines of GBP description before they call.

A driving instructor without a website is leaving money on the table for two reasons. The obvious one is that some learners (especially parents booking on behalf of their children) want to read your prices, your ADI grade, and what areas you cover before they ring. The less obvious one is that without a website, your GBP listing has nowhere to send people who click “website” - so Google has nothing to feed its quality signals with.

The 49% with websites are mostly on outdated templates

We visited the websites of all 28 instructors who had one. The picture roughly split in two.

Stale templates (39%):Wix, IONOS, Weebly, or self-built WordPress sites copyrighted somewhere between 2016 and 2022, with no recent updates. One had a footer link to a dead Google+ account. Another's site title still read “Mysitechrisbarker-adi.co.uk” - the default name from the website builder, never changed.

Reasonably maintained (61%): modern enough, mobile responsive, but with copy that could describe any instructor anywhere. No personality, no specific local knowledge, no real prices on the page.

Almost none of them had something a person would call “current”. Regularly updated content. Recent photos. A blog or news section. Social proof tied to real names. Those things were missing across the board.

Reviews are very good - 4.92★ average across 5,533 reviews

The biggest surprise in the audit was how good these instructors' Google reviews are. Across 57 businesses there are 5,533 Google reviews at an average of 4.92 stars. 36 instructors (63%) have a perfect 5.0 rating. The lowest rating in the dataset is 4.0.

63% of instructors in the sample have a perfect 5★ Google rating. Their websites do not reflect this.

This was the bit that genuinely surprised us. The product - the actual driving lessons - is clearly very good. The shopfront, where one exists, almost never reflects that. It's a fixable problem. Cleaner site, clearer prices, the real reviews pulled onto the homepage instead of buried in GBP. That's the thing that turns a Google searcher into a phone call.

32% have 100+ reviews; only 26% link a Facebook page

Eighteen of the 57 instructors have 100 or more Google reviews. One has 596 (Pip's School of Motoring in Keighley). That's a level of social proof most local trades would kill for. And yet only 26% link any Facebook page from their GBP, and only 5% link Instagram or X. Most of these instructors are missing the basic step of pointing one platform at another.

The instructors with an active social presence skewed younger and female. All three of the Instagram-linked accounts in the dataset belong to women under 40. There's probably a generational divide in the website gap too, but we didn't collect age data, so that's a hypothesis, not a finding.

Methodology

How we picked the sample

We built a list of 65 driving instructors across West Yorkshire and South Yorkshire, focusing on Wakefield, Leeds, Bradford, Halifax, Huddersfield, Sheffield, Pontefract, Castleford, Barnsley, Skipton, York and Keighley. The list came from two sources:

  • Google Maps searches for “driving instructor [town]” in each location, taking the top 5-10 organic GBP results (49 instructors).
  • Manual cross-reference against the Driving Instructors Association directory, prioritising instructors with 20+ reviews and 4.3+ ratings (16 instructors, 8 of which were duplicates).

We deduplicated by phone number and business name. The final sample was 57 unique instructors.

How we audited each one

For each instructor we recorded their business name, instructor name, phone number, address, GBP review count, GBP rating, any linked Facebook/Instagram/X account, and whether they had an independent website. Where a website existed, we visited it and noted: copyright year, builder platform (Wix, WordPress, etc.), whether prices were listed, whether a real photo of the instructor appeared, and a one-line subjective quality assessment.

Then we sorted each instructor into one of four groups:

  • Tier 1, no website (14 instructors): no independent site at all.
  • Tier 2, outdated website (11 instructors): site exists but is four or more years old or sits on a default template.
  • Tier 3, website OK (17 instructors): modern enough, but generic.
  • Needs verification(15 instructors): mostly people with 50+ reviews where we couldn't conclusively confirm presence or absence of a site without a phone call.

The full dataset is available on request - email hello@seenely.com with subject “Yorkshire instructor audit dataset”.

What this means if you're an instructor reading this

The bar is lower than you think.Half your local competition has no website. Most of the rest have a Wix template from 2018. A clean, current one-page site with your real photo, your prices, your areas covered, and your phone number puts you in the top 10% of your local market. That's before you do anything else.

Your reviews are doing the heavy lifting and your shopfront isn't helping.If you have 50+ Google reviews at 4.8★ or higher, that's a huge asset. Get them onto a website where Google can see them alongside your name, address and phone, and you'll climb the local pack. Leave them buried in Google Maps and they only help the people who are already on Google Maps.

Just posting a phone number is not enough.Parents booking lessons for a 17-year-old want to see who you are before they call. They want a current photo, your DVSA credentials, what your hourly rate is, and which areas you cover. A GBP listing alone gives them none of that beyond a 250-character description. A one-page website gives them all of it in 30 seconds.

If you want help

We build, host and maintain websites for sole-trader UK instructors at £20 a month, no setup fee. See the dedicated driving-instructor page for what's included, or read what to put on it if you'd rather build it yourself.

We'll repeat this audit quarterly with an expanded sample (target: 200 UK instructors by Q4 2026) and publish the diff. If you're an instructor in the dataset and want us to update your row, email hello@seenely.com.

We build websites for small businesses.

£20 a month, everything included. Live next day.

Request to build my website